Tag Archives: chocolate

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

November 21, 2012

Posted under

Reviews

Comments

Leave a comment

Ken Schmidt/Iron Fist/Stone Mint Chocolate Imperial Stout

IMG_1464

Ken Schmidt – California Homebrewer

Iron Fist Brewing Co. – Vista, CA

Stone Brewing Co. – San Diego, CA

Mint Chocolate Imperial Stout

9.6% ABV

Stone‘s collaboration series has been AWOL for a while as the brewery’s celebrated its 16th anniversary and the 10th anniversary of Ruination. That’s been depressing as I’ve been a huge fan of all the collaborations they’ve put out this year, including  TBA and More Brown Than Black.

But they’re back in the saddle again with the cryptically named Mint Chocolate Imperial Stout. This time around, they’ve teamed up with Iron Fist and homebrewer extraordinaire Ken Schmidt, who won Stone’s 2012 Homebrew Competition earlier this year. As the winner of the competition, Schmidt had his beer brewed and produced by Stone for all of us to enjoy. (Schmidt had previously won the 2009 competition, which resulted in the Kona Coffee Macadamia Coconut Porter brewed with Stone and Maui Brewing Co.)

For the larger batch, the brewery used chocolate from ChocoVivo and organic chocolate mint and peppermint grown at Stone Farms. The result is an imperial stout that tastes of chocolate and mint. Bet you never guessed that.

The collaboration has that standard imperial stout appearance. Pitch black with no light getting through it. There was about a half a finger worth of head on top made up of a lot of tight brownish bubbles. It lingered for a while, which was surprising for a higher ABV beer. The lacing and alcohol legs were really nice and held on for a while.

A lot of reviews have described the beer as smelling like a liquified Andes mint, or one of those fancy mints you get on your pillow at a hotel. I can’t think of a more apt description. The rich, sweet chocolate and mint are right there from the get go. The mint is a nice, natural-smelling flavor.  It’s a great touch, and it’s all self-explanatory.

The flavor follows the nose perfectly. There’s a very slight bitterness on the front of the tongue, a medium body mouthfeel and some good carbonation across the palate. The chocolate develops first on the finish. It’s a good balance between sweet and dry. The mint rises on the very back and leads to a pretty dry aftertaste. For nearly 10%, the alcohol is just mildly present on the back.

A lot of people have commented that they didn’t get much mint off this collaboration, but I thought it was a perfect amount. Not at all artificial or overpowering, it melded nicely with the chocolate flavors, which were also rich, but not overly strong. Another winner of a collaboration.

Now I just have to bide my time until The Perfect Crime comes out.

Standard

Posted by

Posted on

September 14, 2012

Posted under

Reviews

Comments

3 Comments

Founders Breakfast Stout (2010 vs. 2012)

Untitled

Founders Brewing Co.

Grand Rapids, MI

Breakfast Stout American Stout

8.3% ABV

I find the idea of Stout Season to be a bit redundant – when isn’t it a good time to have a stout? – but if it means it’s time once again for Founders Breakfast Stout to hit the shelves, so be it.

One of my favorite stouts from one of my favorite breweries, Breakfast Stout is a double chocolate coffee oatmeal stout. I’ll be damned is that description doesn’t hits all the right notes on its own. As the name entails, it’s a rich and hearty beer that’s the epitome of a breakfast beer, what with its flaked oats, various foreign and domestic chocolates, and Sumatra and Kona coffee. And now that Founders is back in South Carolina, it means we’re privy to this beauty of a beer.

However, the Palmetto State wasn’t a barren land for Founders before they renewed distribution a few months back. There were a few remnants of Founders from years gone by still lingering in local beer stores, so I snagged a couple of packs of the 2010 batch, which are currently kicking it in my cellar. And in an effort to see how the two batches differ, I decided to crack open one of each and see how they compared.

The pour on each is identical: a thin pitch black with a very slight brownish head that dissipates quickly, no lacing and some nice alcohol legs

On the nose, the 2010 had very pungent notes of coffee and oatmeal. There was a  very strong roastiness and a big bitter dark chocolate character to it, along with a slight astringency. It’s comparable to the coffee on the 2012, but that’s a whole lot more noticeable on the younger batch. You get a big, rich roastiness that coats the slight hints of dark chocolate and oat. It’s a very thick and rich smell.

The taste on the 2010 started with a very slight hop bitterness. The bitter dark chocolate is the first noticeable flavor, followed by the coffee, which comes comes after that with rich roastiness. The smoothness of the oat takes over after that and you get a taste of a lot of bitter coffee.

The flavors are a stark contrast on the 2012. The beer is much more mellow on tongue with no hop bite at all, and overall it’s much sweeter on palate. The chocolate is again the first flavor but it’s creamier and sweeter. The smooth oat follows and imparts a very creamy aftertaste. The coffee pops on the back and it still ends with a slight bitterness.

While neither batch is bad by any means, I much preferred the 2012, although it may have just been what did it for me that particular night. It was rich, creamy and sweet with all the flavors you’d expect and hope for. (Funny enough, my wife opted for the 2010. She’s a keeper.) I’ve heard this year’s batch is thin and bland compared to last year’s. I can’t comment on that, but there’s never any reason to not buy Breakfast Stout, no matter what season it is.